44 comments for TMX Group, directors, auditors, and regulators
These 44 comments on TSX- and TSXV-listed natural resource companies, and the accompanying schedules, have been prepared with the objective of identifying some of the contributors to the many problems faced by junior exploration companies and their investors, and hopefully convincing those responsible that there is a better way to do things.
When close to 600 companies make a list because they clearly are non-compliant with Continuous Listing Requirements of the TSXV (Policy 2.5, Heading 2.1), it is reasonable to assume that a troublesome pattern has developed.
The comments are designed to give enough facts and generate enough ideas so that people who might jump to a quick conclusion have a chance to be exposed to possibilities that are not so obvious.
There are several targets:
- Some will blame the companies, or at least their directors and promoters.
Others will think it is obvious – TMX Group management and directors who have the power to demand compliance with, and an obligation to follow, their own rules but choose not to.
- Some are going to take a hard look at the auditors and the Canadian Public Accountability Board and question whether true professional standards are being met.
- Some will question whether the securities commissions are fulfilling their mandates.
Please note that all the people listed above make money out of the industry, even while the individual companies and their stakeholders absorb the losses.
All this might be seen as a recipe for a great Canadian financial horror story:
- 600 non-compliant companies,
- over $2 billion in negative working capital,
- over $5 billion in questionable exploration assets,
- illiquid markets,
- impressively worded mandates from organizations that seem to exist for investor protection, and,
- to use an old pun, investors getting the shaft.